Search for: "Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2015, 1:26 pm
Pursuant to Public Authorities Law § 1203-a (1), MABSTOA was not given the authority to construct, reconstruct, improve, maintain and operate any transit facility. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 12:12 pm
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority's and New York City Transit Authority's joint motion for summary judgment (sequence #002) is granted and the complaint is hereby severed and dismissed as against Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and New York City Transit Authority,… [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 9:45 am
Plaintiff sues to recover for personal injury she sustained July 15, 2005, in a car accident between a motor vehicle owned and operated by defendant M and a bus owned by defendants New York City Transit Authority and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and operated by defendant J, in which plaintiff was a passenger. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
The wife moved to hold Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority in civil contempt for failing to comply with the QDRO. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 10:58 am
This is the question that was posed in the case of petitioner versus Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority “MABSTOA” The Appellate Division First Department decided that it was violative of public policy to allow the union to place an employee who was to be disciplined on union paid release time. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
MTA – AND OTHER PARTIES -- FOUND LIABLE FOR NEGLIGENCEAfter the New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, Metropolitan Transportation Authority, and MTA Bus Company were found liable for C.W. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm
Bradford also searched for, and did not find, any accounts in the name of Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 8:18 am
Grievant was employed as a bus driver with the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority. [read post]
6 May 2015, 1:40 pm
Plaintiff was allegedly injured as she exited a bus owned and operated by defendants Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and New York City Transit Authority (defendants). [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 7:12 am
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority’s and New York City Transit Authority’s joint motion for summary judgment (sequence #002) is granted and the complaint is hereby severed and dismissed as against Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and New York City Transit… [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 2:45 pm
Plaintiff sues to recover for personal injury she sustained July 15, 2005, in a car accident between a motor vehicle owned and operated by defendant M and a bus owned by defendants New York City Transit Authority and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and operated by defendant J, in which plaintiff was a passenger. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 1:14 pm
In his original moving papers, JF argues that the South Ferry Site is owned and operated by [the MTA defendants], and that the MTA contracted with JCI to serve as the general contractor for the project. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 3:39 pm
Under motion sequence #002, co-defendants New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA), and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (MABSTOA) move for an granting them summary judgment dismissing the complaint, all claims and cross claims. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 11:32 pm
*The case started after the New York City Transit Authority and the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority [TA] unilaterally adopted new rules setting out revised standards and penalties with respect to convictions, moving violations, and motor vehicle accidents involving TA bus drivers. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:22 pm
Accordingly, the order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered May 26, 2010, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and New York City Transit Authority's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based on the failure to establish a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d),… [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 4:11 am
The Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Authority (MaBSTOA) was created by the Legislature in 1962 after the City of New York seized several privately owned and operated bus lines through its eminent domain power. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 10:39 am
Under motion sequence #002, co-defendants New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA), and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (MABSTOA) move for an granting them summary judgment dismissing the complaint, all claims and cross claims. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 10:39 am
Under motion sequence #002, co-defendants New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA), and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (MABSTOA) move for an granting them summary judgment dismissing the complaint, all claims and cross claims. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 10:39 am
Under motion sequence #002, co-defendants New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA), and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (MABSTOA) move for an granting them summary judgment dismissing the complaint, all claims and cross claims. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Operating Auth., 2015 NY Slip Op 06564, Appellate Division, First Department A bus driver's employment was terminated by the Manhattanand Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (Authority) for alleged sexual harassment of a bus dispatcher. [read post]
